|
The
MphasiS Scandal – And How it
Concerns U.S.
Companies Considering Offshore BPO
June, 2005
Some of our clients may be concerned
about highly-publicized news detailing
the activities of call center employees
who, working for CitiGroup in India,
obtained passwords from U.S. citizens
and used the information to illegally
transfer large sums of money into bogus
bank accounts.
Here are the facts behind this story
and some important considerations about
the true risks of offshore outsourcing.
The Facts:
- In December 2004, four call center
employees, working at an outsourcing
facility operated by MphasiS in India,
obtained PIN codes from four customers
of MphasiS’ client, CitiGroup.
These employees were not authorized
to obtain the PINs.
- In association with others,
the call center employees opened new
accounts at Indian banks using false
identities. Within two months, they
used the PINs and account information
gleaned during their employment at
MphasiS to transfer money from the
bank accounts of CitiGroup customers
to the new accounts at Indian banks.
- By April 2005, the Indian
police had tipped off to the scam by
a U.S. bank, and quickly identified
the individuals involved in the scam.
Arrests were made when those individuals
attempted to withdraw cash from the
falsified accounts.
- $426,000 was stolen; the amount
recovered was $230,000. Detailed
investigations are ongoing, and it
will take about three years for the
perpetrators to be tried and sentenced.
Have There Been Similar Cases of Fraud
Involving BPO Services in India?
Other than the MphasiS case, there have
been no other reported cases involving
a BPO service provider. Credit card fraud
cases have been uncovered that involved
the use of fraudulent cards originating
from the Far East, but those cases were
not linked to an outsourcing provider.
Another incident involved the customer
service representatives of a BPO outfit
extending credit limits without authorization.
In this case the incident was quickly
detected and the employees terminated.
A case of identity theft was also reported
but the incident was quickly detected
and closed before any damages occurred.
How Does the Indian Government Protect
U.S. Companies That Offshore Business
Processes?
India has well-established laws and
a legal framework covering white-collar
crimes. The Information Technology Act
of 2000 goes further than previous legislation
by addressing cyber crime. It links with
the Indian Penal Code, making its coverage
extensive. A number or other statutes
exist covering contracts, company law,
and the like.
Within this framework, BPO service providers
can further protect their clients’ interests
through enforceable contracts that address
the issues of losses arising from the
services provided. Moreover, the Indian
insurance market is evolving and some
insurance coverage is available to cover
employee fraud.
How Do Fraud Cases in India Compare
With Fraud in the U.S. and Other Countries?
Credit card fraud in India is rare by
comparison to other parts of the world – approximately
$900,000 annually. Fraud losses specifically
related to BPO services are less common.
By contrast, annual credit card fraud
and ID theft losses in the U.S. are in
the $2 billion range.
Globally, the top ten countries in terms
of fraud losses, according to a 2000
report prepared by the National White
Collar Crime Center and the Federal Bureau
of Investigation, and published by the
Internet Fraud Complaint Center, include
the U.S., Canada, Ukraine and the Netherlands,
but not India. Even if the data were
updated, it is unlikely that India would
figure anywhere near the top ten.
Conclusion
The MphasiS incident received a great
deal more press coverage than similar
(and more devastating) fraud cases in
the U.S. and around the world. In reality,
the risk of fraud involving outsourced
services is greater in the U.S. than
in India.
Moreover, criminals in the MphasiS case
were apprehended quickly and significant
sums were recovered -- due to stringent
enforcement and a high degree of cooperation
between U.S. and Indian law enforcement
and government agencies. This bodes well
for any company considering offshore
outsourcing at this time.
While every instance of fraud is serious
and should raise concerns, Call Center
Magazine on the web (April 08, 2005)
summed up its opinion of the press coverage
the MphasiS case received:
“…This kind of thing,
though unfortunate, happens everyday
in the US, the UK, and around the
world. The fact that such a small scale
theft came to light shows that the
process actually works; customers report
missing money; missing money is returned
to customer; people who steal are caught.”
India offshore outsourcing
- offshore outsourcing
- Carretek
|